Find a concept
Search for electron. Every match is marked; the highest-ranked result opens in Details.
Search electron
Use the atlas as a map, a reference, a guided narrative, or a reproducible research view. This page covers every user-facing control without requiring the interactive application to load.
Choose a starting method based on what you want to do. Each example below opens real atlas content and, where relevant, a complete saved application state.
Search for electron. Every match is marked; the highest-ranked result opens in Details.
Search electronOpen Group with its canonical concept URL, then follow its recorded relations.
Open GroupStart From sets to spaces, or jump directly to the Topological space step.
Open Story at step 5Open Mathematics in Domains layout with Algebra selected. The aggregate arrows summarize the visible directed relations.
Open domain structureOpen the diamond where a group and total order jointly form a totally ordered group.
Open construction diamondOpen only Algebra, with Group selected. The compact share tokens encode the complete filter and display state.
Open saved Algebra stateThe atlas is an editorial map of structural, mathematical, physical, chemical, historical, and evidential relationships. Position supports interpretation, but it is not a proof and horizontal distance is not a metric.
One solid rounded node represents one concept. Its fill and lane use its primary domain.
Small colored markers show secondary memberships. The concept remains one node, not a duplicate.
A diamond is an AND construction: every listed input and the compatibility condition are required.
In Layered layout, authored vertical levels generally move from less structure near the top toward specialization, added data or axioms, composition, approximation, physical realization, collective organization, or emergence below. Mathematics occupies the upper formal band. Physics and Chemistry share the lower scientific band while retaining their authored relative levels. Horizontal lanes group primary domains; their separation is organizational rather than quantitative.
An arrow has three parts: its direction, its relation type, and its specific annotation. Do not infer that every downward edge means “derived from,” or that experimental support is logical proof. Select an edge to read its exact meaning and sources.
When you select a subset of domains, the atlas can retain required prerequisite concepts from outside that subset. Those nodes are normally faded. They are context, not direct matches. Hide prerequisites removes this closure; domain and field suppression can restrict it more selectively.
When construction junctions are visible, incoming branches meet at a diamond and an outgoing branch reaches the result. When junctions are hidden, the atlas contracts the diamond into dashed direct branches. Labels beginning with jointly still mean every associated branch is required.
Arrow direction and edge type are authored claims. The exact annotation on an edge states what changes in that particular relation.
Equip an existing carrier or structured object with additional chosen data, when such compatible data exists. Use a construction junction when several independently meaningful inputs must coexist on the same carrier or interact compatibly.
Keep the existing data and select the subclass satisfying an additional law, existence condition, finiteness condition, or other property.
Pass canonically from a stronger object to structure it determines, or forget part of the data while retaining a valid weaker structure. The carrier may change under a canonical induced construction.
Apply a standard functorial or canonical construction whose output is not merely a reduct of the input and is not generally an equivalent presentation of the same object.
Identify elements by a stated equivalence relation and equip the quotient with the induced structure. The edge detail must state the representatives and equivalence relation.
Map one structure injectively into another by the standard structure-preserving inclusion or representation. This records a canonical copy, not necessarily literal set containment.
Feed several structures into a construction junction and impose compatibility between them.
Reinterpret an object, pass to an equivalent presentation, or relate canonically corresponding structures; the carrier may change.
Record a genuine theorem implication that is not part of the target definition; these edges may point toward a weaker structure.
A mathematical concept supplies part of the formal language, state space, representation, or analytic machinery used by a scientific or mathematical-physics concept. The source is the mathematical predecessor; this does not claim that physical content follows from mathematics alone.
A more specific theory, model, entity class, or regime is obtained by restricting or extending the scope of a broader framework.
A classical system or field theory is used to construct a quantum theory through a stated quantization procedure. Quantization need not be unique and is not guaranteed to preserve every classical structure.
The source supplies a substantive formal ingredient, dynamical sector, law, field content, or mechanism of the target theoretical framework.
A theory, law, or interaction describes the behavior of the target within a stated regime. The edge detail must state important limits or qualifications.
The source is a material constituent, structural component, or underlying quantum field whose excitation realizes the target physical system or particle. The edge label and detail must distinguish composition from field excitation; neither implies a simple classical sum of parts.
The target is a member or subtype of the broader source class.
The source field, particle, charge, current, or interaction couples to, acts on, binds, forms, or stabilizes the target in the stated regime. The edge label and detail must identify the exact coupling, interaction, or binding claim and its qualifications.
The target is recovered from the source either in a stated mathematical or asymptotic limit, or through a quantitatively controlled approximation with identified small parameters or omitted terms. The edge label and detail must state which case applies and its regime of validity.
The target retains the degrees of freedom and interactions relevant below a stated scale or within a stated regime, while higher-energy or unresolved degrees of freedom from the source are integrated out, coarse-grained, or encoded in effective couplings.
The target is a model, idealization, restricted ansatz, approximation scheme, phenomenological fit, or historical representation used for the source system or theory. It need not have a universal small error parameter and is not thereby a controlled limit or effective theory. The edge label and detail must identify the precise status.
The target is a collective, organizational, or scale-dependent phenomenon of the source constituents and interactions; it is not a mere list or classical sum of constituents.
The target represents a state, property, observable, or state-dependent description associated with the source system or theory.
A physical process transforms the source into, or produces, the target under the conditions stated in the edge detail.
The source experiment, observation, anomaly, or problem materially motivated the development, revision, or acceptance of the target concept. Historical influence is not logical derivation; the edge detail states the documented role and avoids retrospective origin myths.
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
Try the real “electron” search →
The top navigation opens the entire atlas or a field route such as Mathematics, Physics, or Chemistry. Domain pages such as Algebra and Quantum mechanics are also interactive application routes with static, crawlable page content underneath.
The Directory is the complete static overview: field and domain summaries, all canonical concept links, the relation legend, and the all-in SVG.
Filters determine which concepts and relations are admitted. Display settings change how that admitted graph is presented. The URL records both groups independently.
The visibility button beside each domain cycles through three states. This is separate from whether its checkbox is selected.
Ordinary direct matching and prerequisite context.
A node whose primary domain is excluded is not admitted merely as prerequisite context. An enabled, non-excluded secondary membership may still select it directly.
A node with that primary domain is always hidden, including through secondary memberships and prerequisite closure.
Field suppression is two-state: allowed or excluded. Domain suppression cycles gray → yellow → red → gray.
Relation checkboxes control both the edges drawn and the relation types allowed to participate in prerequisite closure. Selecting a relation-type name isolates that type; selecting the same isolated name again chooses every other active type.
Uses authored vertical levels and primary-domain lanes. It is the best layout for reading structural progression and cross-field placement.
Uses only currently visible nodes. Empty authored levels consume no rows, and deterministic ordering makes the same visible set reproduce the same arrangement.
Preserves the Layered concept positions as a dim substrate, then summarizes visible primary domains as centroid nodes connected by weighted directed aggregate relations.
Uses the same semantic-overview method at field scale. It is useful for seeing the overall flow among Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry.
In Domains and Fields layouts, selecting a centroid hides unrelated aggregate arrows until the selection is cleared. Selecting a centroid or aggregate relation opens counts and supporting relations in Details. Arrow thickness records how many visible authored relations contribute to that aggregate direction.
Open the field structure with Physics selected →
Details is the atlas’s reading surface. Select a concept, construction junction, edge, domain, field, or aggregate relation to inspect the corresponding record.
Summary, field and domain memberships, type and scale metadata, carriers, data, axioms or constraints, induced structures, editorial sections, notes, relations, Stories, Views, and sources.
Source and target, edge type, the exact “what changes” annotation, interpretation of the type, and citations. In relation groups, the destination appears first and the annotation follows as via [annotation].
All required inputs, the compatibility condition, and the resulting concept. Hidden-junction synthetic edges repeat the AND warning.
Visible concept counts, aggregate in/out counts, and the authored relations contributing to a selected domain, field, or aggregate arrow.
Taxonomy badges and relation links are navigable. A relation link can reveal a concept currently hidden by ordinary filters, but it does not silently override a prohibited-domain setting.
A curated graph configuration: fields, domains, relation types, display options, layout, and optional core nodes.
A View with an ordered concept sequence. Numbered badges mark its nodes, and Previous/Next controls move through the sequence while leaving the rest of the graph available for exploration.
Enable Experimental features in Preferences to reveal Compare in the toolbar and concept Details.
Contrasts two concepts’ recorded definitions, taxonomy, source overlap, direct enabled relations, relation-type profile, and shared adjacent concepts.
Finds up to three short paths through the currently visible graph. Choose either traversal direction while preserving arrow meaning, or follow authored arrows from A to B only.
Connections never silently re-enable hidden concepts or relation types. A path is limited to twelve relations. You can choose an alternative path, fit it, select its nodes or edges, and copy its node sequence in Story-authoring format.
Preferences are saved only in the current browser. They are intentionally excluded from shared URLs.
Reset restores the default preference set. It does not change filters or the shareable display state.
The atlas is interactive, but its principal routes also publish static HTML for search engines, citation, accessibility, and no-script browsing.
The graph is editorially selective and source-backed. Use the citations attached to each record for technical verification rather than treating the map’s geometry as evidence by itself.
/ focuses search · F fits the graph · Escape clears search and closes open mobile panels. Search suggestions and Compare tabs support arrow-key navigation.
Pinch to zoom and drag to pan. Filters enter from the left; Details rises from the bottom. The active Story or View context moves into the Details surface when necessary.
All toolbar buttons and filter controls have accessible names. The static Directory and this guide remain usable without JavaScript.