Type to see ranked matches. Use the up and down arrow keys to choose a result, then press Enter to open it.
Preparing the interactive atlas…
Keyboard graph navigation: press N for concepts or E for relations; use arrow keys, Home, and End to move; Enter selects; Shift plus Enter selects and centers; plus and minus zoom; zero fits; Escape clears the selection. Use the visible viewport buttons as alternatives to dragging, wheel, and pinch gestures.
Select a concept
Select any concept, construction junction, or annotated relation by pointer, touch, search, or keyboard.
Construction junctions are diamonds. They show where multiple structures must coexist on the same carrier and satisfy compatibility conditions.
Move selected concept
Single-pointer and keyboard alternatives to dragging. Each activation moves the selected concept one step.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
abelian_category_to_derived_category
Relation type
Canonical construction canonical-construction
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Canonically constructs; target: Canonically constructed from
Authored annotation
form D(A)
Authored explanation
Form complexes in A, pass to the homotopy category K(A), and localize at quasi-isomorphisms. The result is a new category, not an equivalent presentation of A.
How to interpret this relation type
Apply a standard functorial or canonical construction whose output is not merely a reduct of the input and is not generally an equivalent presentation of the same object.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
quasi_isomorphism_to_derived_category
Relation type
Canonical construction canonical-construction
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Canonically constructs; target: Canonically constructed from
Authored annotation
formally invert quasi-isomorphisms
Authored explanation
The derived category is obtained from a suitable category of complexes by localizing at quasi-isomorphisms; this is categorical localization, not an elementwise quotient.
How to interpret this relation type
Apply a standard functorial or canonical construction whose output is not merely a reduct of the input and is not generally an equivalent presentation of the same object.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
derived_category_to_ext
Relation type
Canonical construction canonical-construction
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Canonically constructs; target: Canonically constructed from
Authored annotation
shifted derived morphisms
Authored explanation
In the derived category of an abelian category, Extn(A,B) is represented by morphisms A→B[n].
How to interpret this relation type
Apply a standard functorial or canonical construction whose output is not merely a reduct of the input and is not generally an equivalent presentation of the same object.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
derived_category_to_tor
Relation type
Canonical construction canonical-construction
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Canonically constructs; target: Canonically constructed from
Authored annotation
homology of the derived tensor product
Authored explanation
In derived categories of modules, the homology of M⊗RLN computes TornR(M,N), with grading conventions stated explicitly.
How to interpret this relation type
Apply a standard functorial or canonical construction whose output is not merely a reduct of the input and is not generally an equivalent presentation of the same object.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
e_derived_triang
Relation type
Induced / forgotten induced-forgotten
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Yields by induction / forgetting; target: Obtained by induction / forgetting from
Authored annotation
retain canonical triangulation
Authored explanation
A derived category carries a canonical triangulated structure.
How to interpret this relation type
Pass canonically from a stronger object to structure it determines, or forget part of the data while retaining a valid weaker structure. The carrier may change under a canonical induced construction.