Type to see ranked matches. Use the up and down arrow keys to choose a result, then press Enter to open it.
Preparing the interactive atlas…
Keyboard graph navigation: press N for concepts or E for relations; use arrow keys, Home, and End to move; Enter selects; Shift plus Enter selects and centers; plus and minus zoom; zero fits; Escape clears the selection. Use the visible viewport buttons as alternatives to dragging, wheel, and pinch gestures.
Select a concept
Select any concept, construction junction, or annotated relation by pointer, touch, search, or keyboard.
Construction junctions are diamonds. They show where multiple structures must coexist on the same carrier and satisfy compatibility conditions.
Move selected concept
Single-pointer and keyboard alternatives to dragging. Each activation moves the selected concept one step.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
neutrinomixing_to_osc
Relation type
Describes / governs describes-governs
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Describes / governs; target: Described / governed by
Authored annotation
coherent flavor oscillation
Authored explanation
Coherent propagation of distinct neutrino mass eigenstates produces energy- and baseline-dependent flavor oscillation.
How to interpret this relation type
A theory, law, or interaction describes the behavior of the target within a stated regime. The edge detail must state important limits or qualifications.
source: Historically motivated; target: Historically motivated by
Authored annotation
missing electron-neutrino flux
Authored explanation
The persistent deficit motivated oscillation and flavor-conversion explanations later tested by Super-Kamiokande and SNO.
How to interpret this relation type
The source experiment, observation, anomaly, or problem materially motivated the development, revision, or acceptance of the target concept. Historical influence is not logical derivation; the edge detail states the documented role and avoids retrospective origin myths.
The total active-neutrino flux agreed with solar predictions while the electron-neutrino component was depleted.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
The zenith and energy dependence agreed with oscillation of muon neutrinos.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.