Type to see ranked matches. Use the up and down arrow keys to choose a result, then press Enter to open it.
Preparing the interactive atlas…
Keyboard graph navigation: press N for concepts or E for relations; use arrow keys, Home, and End to move; Enter selects; Shift plus Enter selects and centers; plus and minus zoom; zero fits; Escape clears the selection. Use the visible viewport buttons as alternatives to dragging, wheel, and pinch gestures.
Select a concept
Select any concept, construction junction, or annotated relation by pointer, touch, search, or keyboard.
Construction junctions are diamonds. They show where multiple structures must coexist on the same carrier and satisfy compatibility conditions.
Move selected concept
Single-pointer and keyboard alternatives to dragging. Each activation moves the selected concept one step.
High-energy electron scattering from nucleons revealed approximately pointlike charged constituents and scaling behavior, establishing partonic nucleon structure and driving quark acceptance.
Deep-inelastic data underpin the QCD description of nucleon structure; exact scaling is modified by QCD evolution.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
hist_slac_deep_inelastic_scattering_to_quark
Relation type
Historically motivated historically-motivated
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Historically motivated; target: Historically motivated by
Authored annotation
pointlike nucleon constituents
Authored explanation
Scaling and hard scattering made quark-like partons empirically unavoidable and transformed quarks from a classification device into physical constituents.
How to interpret this relation type
The source experiment, observation, anomaly, or problem materially motivated the development, revision, or acceptance of the target concept. Historical influence is not logical derivation; the edge detail states the documented role and avoids retrospective origin myths.