Type to see ranked matches. Use the up and down arrow keys to choose a result, then press Enter to open it.
Preparing the interactive atlas…
Keyboard graph navigation: press N for concepts or E for relations; use arrow keys, Home, and End to move; Enter selects; Shift plus Enter selects and centers; plus and minus zoom; zero fits; Escape clears the selection. Use the visible viewport buttons as alternatives to dragging, wheel, and pinch gestures.
Select a concept
Select any concept, construction junction, or annotated relation by pointer, touch, search, or keyboard.
Construction junctions are diamonds. They show where multiple structures must coexist on the same carrier and satisfy compatibility conditions.
Move selected concept
Single-pointer and keyboard alternatives to dragging. Each activation moves the selected concept one step.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
nrqed_to_atomicqed
Relation type
Describes / governs describes-governs
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Describes / governs; target: Described / governed by
Authored annotation
bound-state radiative expansion
Authored explanation
NRQED organizes radiative, recoil, and relativistic corrections for light atomic bound states.
How to interpret this relation type
A theory, law, or interaction describes the behavior of the target within a stated regime. The edge detail must state important limits or qualifications.
source: Historically motivated; target: Historically motivated by
Authored annotation
precision bound-state discrepancy
Authored explanation
The discrepancy forced renewed scrutiny of bound-state QED, recoil, spectroscopy, and systematic effects.
How to interpret this relation type
The source experiment, observation, anomaly, or problem materially motivated the development, revision, or acceptance of the target concept. Historical influence is not logical derivation; the edge detail states the documented role and avoids retrospective origin myths.
source: Has limiting / approximate regime; target: Recovered by limit / approximation
Authored annotation
bound-state perturbative corrections
Authored explanation
Atomic QED computes radiative corrections in expansions adapted to bound states, with nonperturbative-in-Zα methods for high Z.
How to interpret this relation type
The target is recovered from the source either in a stated mathematical or asymptotic limit, or through a quantitatively controlled approximation with identified small parameters or omitted terms. The edge label and detail must state which case applies and its regime of validity.
The observed splitting is a foundational benchmark for atomic QED corrections.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
Relation sources
Wikipedia — Lamb shift — Lamb shift · encyclopedic reference · source ID wp-physics-lamb_shift
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
atomicqed_to_lamb
Relation type
Describes / governs describes-governs
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Describes / governs; target: Described / governed by
Authored annotation
radiative level splitting
Authored explanation
Self-energy and vacuum polarization dominate the Lamb shift, with recoil and nuclear-size contributions also relevant.
How to interpret this relation type
A theory, law, or interaction describes the behavior of the target within a stated regime. The edge detail must state important limits or qualifications.
Relation sources
Wikipedia — Lamb shift — Lamb shift · encyclopedic reference · source ID wp-physics-lamb_shift