Type to see ranked matches. Use the up and down arrow keys to choose a result, then press Enter to open it.
Preparing the interactive atlas…
Keyboard graph navigation: press N for concepts or E for relations; use arrow keys, Home, and End to move; Enter selects; Shift plus Enter selects and centers; plus and minus zoom; zero fits; Escape clears the selection. Use the visible viewport buttons as alternatives to dragging, wheel, and pinch gestures.
Select a concept
Select any concept, construction junction, or annotated relation by pointer, touch, search, or keyboard.
Construction junctions are diamonds. They show where multiple structures must coexist on the same carrier and satisfy compatibility conditions.
Move selected concept
Single-pointer and keyboard alternatives to dragging. Each activation moves the selected concept one step.
The renormalizable gauge quantum field theory with gauge group SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)Y, three observed fermion generations, one Higgs doublet, and the strong and electroweak interactions; gravity is not included.
No alternate terminology is currently authored for this record.
Concept type
Theory or framework
Status
Established theory within tested domain
Field content
Gauge fields for SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)Y, three generations of chiral quark and lepton multiplets, and one complex Higgs doublet.
Interaction terms
Quark–gluon and gluon self-interactions from SU(3)C.
Charged-current, neutral-current, and electroweak gauge-boson self-interactions.
Photon couplings to electric current.
Higgs self-coupling, Higgs–gauge couplings, and Yukawa couplings to fermions.
Minimal-model qualification
The minimal renormalizable Standard Model has no neutrino-mass term. Observed neutrino oscillations therefore require an extension, such as additional fields or higher-dimension operators.
Known limitations
No quantum theory of gravity.
No established particle explanation of dark matter or dark energy.
Does not explain the number of generations, flavor parameters, baryon asymmetry, or the origin and nature of neutrino masses.
Concept sources
Wikipedia — Standard Model — Standard Model · encyclopedic reference · source ID wp-physics-standard_model
The discovery supplied the previously missing scalar excitation of the minimal Standard Model.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
Relation sources
Wikipedia — Higgs boson — Higgs boson · encyclopedic reference · source ID wp-physics-higgs_boson
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
standard_model_to_elementary
Relation type
Describes / governs describes-governs
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Describes / governs; target: Described / governed by
Authored annotation
particle content
Authored explanation
The Standard Model specifies fields and interactions for the known elementary particles.
How to interpret this relation type
A theory, law, or interaction describes the behavior of the target within a stated regime. The edge detail must state important limits or qualifications.
Relation sources
CERN — The Standard Model — The Standard Model · CERN reference overview · source ID cern-standard-model
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
chiral_to_anomalycancellation
Relation type
Theorem implication theorem-implication
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Implies by theorem; target: Follows by theorem from
Authored annotation
complete chiral content cancels anomalies
Authored explanation
For the complete chiral fermion content of each Standard Model generation, the hypercharges and color/weak representations cancel the perturbative gauge, mixed gauge–gravitational, and cubic hypercharge anomalies. An isolated chiral multiplet generally does not.
How to interpret this relation type
Record a genuine theorem implication that is not part of the target definition; these edges may point toward a weaker structure.
LEP observables agreed with loop-corrected Standard Model predictions and constrained the number of light active neutrinos.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
sm_to_left
Relation type
Effective theory / model effective-theory
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Has effective description; target: Effective description of
Authored annotation
integrate out electroweak-scale fields
Authored explanation
Below the electroweak scale, integrating out W, Z, Higgs, and top degrees of freedom yields LEFT with QCD, QED, and local higher-dimension operators.
How to interpret this relation type
The target retains the degrees of freedom and interactions relevant below a stated scale or within a stated regime, while higher-energy or unresolved degrees of freedom from the source are integrated out, coarse-grained, or encoded in effective couplings.
This is an authored directed relation from the source endpoint to the target endpoint.
Relation ID
sm_to_smeft
Relation type
Add data add-data
Direction
source → target
Endpoint roles
source: Builds toward; target: Built from
Authored annotation
higher-dimension operator extension
Authored explanation
SMEFT extends the Standard Model Lagrangian by higher-dimension operators built from Standard Model fields and symmetries. It is an EFT of unspecified heavy new physics, not an effective reduction of the Standard Model itself.
How to interpret this relation type
Equip an existing carrier or structured object with additional chosen data, when such compatible data exists. Use a construction junction when several independently meaningful inputs must coexist on the same carrier or interact compatibly.
Discovery completed the quark content required by the established third-generation electroweak doublet.
How to interpret this relation type
The source theory, law, entity, prediction, or structural claim is directly tested, supported, constrained, or established by the target experiment or observation. Experimental support is not final logical proof; the edge detail states exactly what was measured.
Relation sources
Wikipedia — Top quark — Top quark · encyclopedic reference · source ID wp-physics-top_quark